[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

2013-01-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

2013-01-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

2013-01-15 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 --- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-15 09:04:35 UTC --- >> False return from these functions will not negatively impact GCC at run time No change in libsanitizer can affect GCC at run time unless you are building something with -

[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

2013-01-15 Thread PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 --- Comment #2 from Paul H. Hargrove 2013-01-15 08:59:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Will the following patch work? [...] Yes, it allows the compilation to complete. SInce I don't know anything to the contrary, I'll assume tha

[Bug sanitizer/55989] [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer

2013-01-15 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55989 --- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-15 08:49:42 UTC --- Will the following patch work? Index: sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc === --- sanitizer_common/saniti