[Bug sanitizer/108497] UBsan at -O1 failed to report an integer-overflow

2023-04-03 Thread shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108497 --- Comment #4 from Li Shaohua --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Not now nor in the near future. After all, it isn't a regression, so > couldn't be fixed during stage4 anyway. This bug affects GCC>=8. GCC<=7 work fine on this c

[Bug sanitizer/108497] UBsan at -O1 failed to report an integer-overflow

2023-01-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108497 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Not now nor in the near future. After all, it isn't a regression, so couldn't be fixed during stage4 anyway.

[Bug sanitizer/108497] UBsan at -O1 failed to report an integer-overflow

2023-01-24 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108497 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- @Jakub: Can you please take a look?

[Bug sanitizer/108497] UBsan at -O1 failed to report an integer-overflow

2023-01-23 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108497 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0