https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f806bea0a6c1c5b7d517c7aee053c21b4d2155c6
commit r9-10103-gf806bea0a6c1c5b7d517c7aee053c21b4d2155c6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f4f13c1d42c0eac9ccfe3f5a925389def881033
commit r10-10646-g9f4f13c1d42c0eac9ccfe3f5a925389def881033
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcf70cb0d85d04ff680a361e32d79c326ae8b3fc
commit r11-9074-gdcf70cb0d85d04ff680a361e32d79c326ae8b3fc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c1a633d96926357155d4702b66f8a0ec856a81f
commit r12-4042-g9c1a633d96926357155d4702b66f8a0ec856a81f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51530
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51530&action=edit
patch
For reference, this is my patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 51529 [details]
> gcc12-pr102515.patch
>
> I have one too, even bootstrapped/regtested overnight, just didn't get to
> writing new testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51529
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51529&action=edit
gcc12-pr102515.patch
I have one too, even bootstrapped/regtested overnight, just didn't get to
writing new tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, clang documents:
-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow: Signed integer overflow, where the result
of a signed integer computation cannot be represented in its type. This
includes all the checks covered b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I see - I wonder whether we should do || sanitize_flags_p
(SANITIZE_SI_OVERFLOW) for this specific case.
For -ftrapv I also really was looking at instrumentation from the frontend
rather than from pass_ubs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
ubsan already handles that in c-family/c-ubsan.c (ubsan_instrument_division).
But we don't have an ifn for that. And it is not covered by
-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow but -fsanitize=integer-divide-by-
12 matches
Mail list logo
