https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #13 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Alexander Enaldiev from comment #12)
> But here I see status 'RESOLVED FIXED'. Do you presume, my today's issue
> isn't connected?
It could still be the same bug. It's supposed to be fixed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
Alexander Enaldiev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.enaldiev at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
Bug 100114 depends on bug 101749, which changed state.
Bug 101749 Summary: gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs
__cxa_guard_release in libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef195a39d0d3b929cc676302d074b42c25460601
commit r8-10912-gef195a39d0d3b929cc676302d074b42c25460601
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d0135bf3be416bbe2531dc763d19b749eb2b856
commit r9-9450-g3d0135bf3be416bbe2531dc763d19b749eb2b856
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:950bac27d63c1c2ac3a6ed867692d6a13f21feb3
commit r10-9732-g950bac27d63c1c2ac3a6ed867692d6a13f21feb3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far, guess some backporting will be useful.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9f462fb372fb02da032cefd6b091d7582c425ae
commit r11-8230-gd9f462fb372fb02da032cefd6b091d7582c425ae
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
const vars in C++ can't be uninitialized nor modified.
And initializing those in constructor or .init_array is too late, the problem
is
that the function is called from .preinit_array handler, so before anyt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Confirmed by code inspection, but it's for sure sth not new (but would be
> nice to fix before GCC 11.1).
>
> I suggtest to simply move the initialization inside Set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed by code inspection, but it's for sure sth not new (but would be nice
to fix before GCC 11.1).
I suggtest to simply move the initialization inside SetAlternateSignalStack.
Sth like
diff --git a/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As a quick hack, we could do something like:
#ifdef _SC_SIGSTKSZ
#define kAltStackSize (SIGSTKSZ * 4)
#else
static const uptr kAltStackSize = SIGSTKSZ * 4; // SIGSTKSZ is not enough.
#endif
but the disadvan
15 matches
Mail list logo
