https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94798
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94798
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||3507
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94798
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Related to what I wrote in PR94802
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94802#c5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94798
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As for the subtraction followed by comparison, I think this is something
normally optimized through peephole2, but that one doesn't trigger in this case
due to RA decisions, where it sees different operands:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94798
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94798
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Ok, will do that in the future. Considering I was just linking to godbolt every
time for the assembly code, should I go back to all the other bug reports that
I've made to upload assembly code there too ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94798
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Gabriel Ravier from comment #0)
> Comparison here : https://godbolt.org/z/LZ8dBy
In your future bug reports, could you please copy all relevant information
instead of (or in addition to) linking t
