[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-18 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-14 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 --- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is this still a problem? I think Uros's patch fixed the problem mentioned in comment #9.

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-08 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Oct 8 17:01:55 2019 New Revision: 276707 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276707&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/91994 * config/i386/i386.c (x86_avx_u12

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-07 Thread richard.sandiford at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 --- Comment #11 from richard.sandiford at arm dot com --- "ubizjak at gmail dot com" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 > > --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- > Richard, since vzeroupper clobbers only xmm0-xmm15 (xmm0

Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-07 Thread Richard Sandiford
"ubizjak at gmail dot com" writes: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 > > --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- > Richard, since vzeroupper clobbers only xmm0-xmm15 (xmm0-xmm7 on 32it > targets), > shouldn't we use SSE_REGS instead of ALL_SSE_REGS here: > > Index: i386.c > =

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- Richard, since vzeroupper clobbers only xmm0-xmm15 (xmm0-xmm7 on 32it targets), shouldn't we use SSE_REGS instead of ALL_SSE_REGS here: Index: i386.c ==

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-07 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-07 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Mon Oct 7 08:36:06 2019 New Revision: 276648 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276648&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [i386] Make the vzeroupper pattern describe its effects

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-05 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED C

[Bug rtl-optimization/91994] [10 Regression] r276327 breaks -mvzeroupper

2019-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91994 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10 Regression] r276327 |[10 Regression] r276327 |mis