https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner ---
...or maybe simpler even would be:
Index: gcc/cfgexpand.c
===
--- gcc/cfgexpand.c (revision 249649)
+++ gcc/cfgexpand.c (working copy)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41647|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #10)
> > I'm testing the attached patch which fixes the ICE.
>
> Except this ICEs on the following simple test case. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #10)
> I'm testing the attached patch which fixes the ICE.
Except this ICEs on the following simple test case. I'll see if this is due to
a simple oversite or ...
b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
Created attachment 41647
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41647&action=edit
Proposed patch
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #8)
>> S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #8)
> So we have a switch statement with onc case and a default case statement.
> The normal case statement contains an __builtin_unreachable() call, so we
> delete t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #6 from Marc Mutz ---
Sorry. Here it comes:
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/marc/Qt/qt5-build/qtdeclarative/src/qmldevtools'
g++ -c -pipe -Wno-error=expansion-to-defined -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized
-Wno-error=expansion-to-defin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> I don't see g++ options mentioned anywhere, the testcase compiles even with
> latest trunk just fine with -O0 -std=c++17 or -O2 -std=c++17.
...and compiles fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
Will do, but as Jakub said, we'll need the compiler options used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
13 matches
Mail list logo