https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Sep 8 19:41:20 2019
New Revision: 275495
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275495&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[X86, testsuite] Fix PR rtl-optimisation/64895 XPASSes.
These tests had st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Aug 30 19:00:44 2019
New Revision: 275213
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275213&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Backport fix for 64895 XPASSes.
These tests don't fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
testsuite fix applied for pic targets on trunk and 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 10:24:34 2019
New Revision: 274062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274062&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, X86, backport fixes for 64895.
Although this is marked as rtl-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu May 23 09:23:47 2019
New Revision: 271544
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271544&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
x86, testsuite - update fuse-caller-save tests.
These tests had started to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 46398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46398&action=edit
testsuite patch
Will post this later, tested on x86_64-linux and x86_64-darwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Between revisions r244915 and r244957 I got the following XPASS
I have forgotten to say that it is on x86_64-apple-darwin16.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Between revisions r244915 and r244957 I got the following XPASS
XPASS: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save-rec.c scan-assembler-not pop
XPASS: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save-rec.c scan-assembler-not p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Mar 16 09:42:21 2015
New Revision: 221448
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221448&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert 'Use actual_call_used_reg_set to find conflicting regs'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Mar 12 08:01:24 2015
New Revision: 221374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221374&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert 'require nonpic target' for fuse-caller-save*.c
2015-03-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>From PR64342 comment 7:
Register allocation seems to progress similarly, up until this message in
reload, which seems to be directly related to the r216154 patch:
...
Spill r86 after risky tra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
17 matches
Mail list logo
