subject:"\[Bug rtl\-optimization\/63917\] \[5 Regression\] r217646 caused many failures"

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2015-04-07 Thread yroux at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 --- Comment #12 from Yvan Roux --- Author: yroux Date: Tue Apr 7 13:24:05 2015 New Revision: 221894 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221894&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ 2015-04-07 Yvan Roux Backport from trunk r217062, r217646, r2186

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-12-12 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-12-11 Thread zqchen at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 --- Comment #10 from zqchen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: zqchen Date: Fri Dec 12 05:51:19 2014 New Revision: 218658 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218658&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-12 Zhenqiang Chen PR rtl-optimization/63917

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-12-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- A patch has been submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00478.html waiting for approval!-(

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-12-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-11-22 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-11-20 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #6 from H

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-11-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to clyon from comment #4) > On aarch64, I have noticed that the following tests FAIL after r217646: That is recorded as bug 63971 and just a testsuite issue. In that the return is no longer duplica

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-11-20 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-11-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-11-18 Thread zhenqiang.chen at arm dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 --- Comment #3 from Zhenqiang Chen --- Root cause: r217646 enhances ifcvt to handle cbranchcc4 instruction. But ifcvt does not check whether an insn will clobber CC or not, when moving it before the cbranchcc4 instruction. I will work out a patc

[Bug rtl-optimization/63917] [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures

2014-11-17 Thread zhenqiang.chen at arm dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917 --- Comment #2 from Zhenqiang Chen --- Thanks for the report. I can reproduce the FAIL on IA32. Since the patch does not impact on -O0, it seams some library functions are wrong. I will investigate it.