[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-07-13 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|http://g

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-07-12 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #25 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-07-12 21:14:19 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Thu Jul 12 21:14:14 2012 New Revision: 189441 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189441 Log: PR rtl-optimization/53176 * rtlanal.c (r

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-08 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #23 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-08 16:10:07 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Tue May 8 16:01:54 2012 New Revision: 187289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187289 Log: PR target/53176 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_se

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-06 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #22 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-06 23:28:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) Hopefully it was obvious, but: > ... where natural_set_cost is the cost of > setting a register (possibly the default) ... for the UNITS_PER_WORD cas

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-06 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-06 23:25:40 UTC --- All this should be taken care of by the default rtx costs; I don't think any target patches should be needed for these targets at least not for this case. The default should be

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06 19:21:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > > --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06 > > 18:09:37 UTC --- > > On SH an issue popped up because lower-subreg w

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-06 Thread rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #19 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-05-06 19:17:03 UTC --- "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06 > 18:09:37 UTC --- > On SH an issue popped up because lower-subreg would not sp

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #18 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-04 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #17 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-04 08:20:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > The x86 failure: > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/movbe-2.c scan-assembler-times movbe[ \t] 4 > > is a register allocator/reload problem. I will open new PR for t

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-05-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression]|[4.8 Regression] |gcc.tar