--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-20 21:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19354)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19354&action=view)
gcc44-pr42429.patch
Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-20 20:49 ---
I believe the bug is in [7 %sfp+-140 S1 A8], IMHO it should have been S4,
because otherwise the MEM attrs say it is 1 byte at %sfp+-140, which
nonoverlapping_memrefs_p says can't overlap with [7 %sfp+-137 S1 A8]. Noth
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-19 18:40 ---
After sched1 we have:
(insn 6094 6056 6069 83 u4.c:511 (set (reg:QI 5621)
(mem/s/u/j:QI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 5441)
(reg:SI 5619)) [0 q1 S1 A8])) 73 {*movqi} (expr_list:REG_DEAD
(reg:SI 5619)
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-19 16:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=19350)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19350&action=view)
2fish.c
Updated testcase with lots of asm scheduling barriers inserted, still failing
(and with no- added to opti
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-18 23:17 ---
Btw, we have similar issues with the SLES11 gcc 4.3 compiler and openssl.
See https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457410
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-18 22:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=19347)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19347&action=view)
2fish.c
Simplified testcase from twofish's test. The optimize attribute is of course
not needed to reproduce it,
