--- Comment #20 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-15 07:36 ---
The ICE is fixed on mainline.
[The testsuite failure on x86_64 is a separate issue, tracked by PR 34249.]
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #19 from revitale at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-26 12:15
---
Subject: Bug 34085
Author: revitale
Date: Mon Nov 26 12:15:02 2007
New Revision: 130435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130435
Log:
Fix PR rtl-optimization/34085
Added:
trunk/gcc/tests
--- Comment #18 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-20 11:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR rtl-optimization/34085
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01050.html
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #17 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-18 07:32 ---
I reproduced the ICE on x86_64-linux running tmp.c testcase with r130196.
(please make sure you are running tmp.c testcase and not test.c testcase that
was uploaded by mistake).
GCC configured with:
../gcc/configure -
--- Comment #16 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-17 06:36 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > I still can't reproduce it. What does your gcc -v say?
> Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/eres/check_final/build
> --with-cpu=default32 --enable
--- Comment #15 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-17 06:24 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I still can't reproduce it. What does your gcc -v say?
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/eres/check_final/build
--with-cpu=default32 --enable-checking --disable-bootstrap --e
--- Comment #14 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 21:15 ---
I still can't reproduce it. What does your gcc -v say?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34085
--- Comment #13 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-16 06:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14563)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14563&action=view)
gcno (with the correct filename)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34085
--- Comment #12 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-16 06:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=14562)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14562&action=view)
gcda file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34085
--- Comment #10 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-15 15:02 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I mean the files you generate with -fprofile-generate.
> I expect this to be fully blamable on the partitioning code, and I would like
> to work in fixing this. But you have to attach the pro
--- Comment #11 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-15 15:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=14556)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14556&action=view)
File generated by -fprofile-generate
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34085
--- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 14:49 ---
I mean the files you generate with -fprofile-generate.
I expect this to be fully blamable on the partitioning code, and I would like
to work in fixing this. But you have to attach the profile information you
have ge
--- Comment #8 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-15 14:17 ---
When disabling rest_of_handle_reorder_blocks (bbro) the ICE disappears. (it
seems that it is not caused due to the partitioning - bbpart)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34085
--- Comment #7 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-15 12:29 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I can't reproduce this on x86*.
> Again, please attach the profile information and state the exact compiler
> revision you used to generate this profile information.
Sorry - I am working on r
--- Comment #5 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-15 12:04 ---
It seems that verify_flow_info complains about the following note,
which is generated in the partitioning phase:
(note 234 232 172 11 NOTE_INSN_SWITCH_TEXT_SECTIONS)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 12:21 ---
I can't reproduce this on x86*.
Again, please attach the profile information and state the exact compiler
revision you used to generate this profile information.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #4 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-13 18:34 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Can you please also attach your profile information and give the exact
> compiler
> revision ID that you used to create that information? That way, people
> without
> access to POWER can sti
--- Comment #3 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-13 18:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=14546)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14546&action=view)
the testcase (please ignore the previous testcase it has been uploaded by
mistake)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 18:24 ---
Can you please also attach your profile information and give the exact compiler
revision ID that you used to create that information? That way, people without
access to POWER can still help debug this problem.
--
--- Comment #1 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-11-13 18:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=14545)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14545&action=view)
The testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34085
20 matches
Mail list logo
