--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-01
19:17 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-01
05:26 ---
Subject: Bug 21138
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-01 05:26:45
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog modulo-sched.c
Log messag
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-05-17
20:01 ---
Subject: Re: wrong code in sixtrack for -fmodulo-sched
The patch fixes the problem with sixtrack.
I suspected that a latent problem was causing the earlier failures in
lucas and apsi which have since gone
--- Additional Comments From mustafa at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-17
15:05 ---
Janis, can you try this patch?
Index: modulo-sched.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/modulo-sched.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -c -p -r1.29
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 20:27
---
sixtrack and the testcase smsbug.f still fail on powerpc64-linux when compiled
with mainline GCC with the options "-m64 -O2 -fmodulo-sched". The other
failures with those options mentioned in comment #4 have
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09 19:32
---
sixtrack works fine for me with "-m64 -O2" with both SPEC's test input and its
ref output, for all of my daily builds since 20050503, while with the addition
of -fmodulo-sched it gets miscompares. lucas is no
--- Additional Comments From mustafa at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-04
12:31 ---
Is seems like this is not an SMS bug, sixtrack is failing for me with -m64 -O2
without -fmodulo-sched.
Jania, have you checked that and have a different results?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 00:07
---
There are other SPEC CPU2000 comparison failures on powerpc64-linux
with "-m64 -O2 -fmodulo-sched" that resist attempts to minimize the
testcases. apsi has been failing since:
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-22
13:56 ---
As far as I can tell, the code at .final_cleanup dump is correct,
so the patch most likely reveals some latent bug in sms or one of
the later passes.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-22 00:26
---
The testcase starts failing with this patch from rakdver:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-04/msg00301.html
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
11 matches
Mail list logo
