--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20413
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25
13:10 ---
Fixed on mainline with check-in from today.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25
12:46 ---
Subject: Bug 20413
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 12:46:14
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog cfgrtl.c final.c jump.c loo
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25
12:45 ---
Subject: Bug 20413
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 12:44:47
Modified files:
gcc/doc: rtl.texi
Log message:
2005-
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
13:21 ---
The patch has been posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg01157.html
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-04-11
13:16 ---
Subject: Re: VOIDmode LABEL_REFs are generated
giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-04-11
>12:48 ---
>I have a very naive quest
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-04-11
12:48 ---
I have a very naive question: if LABEL_REFS should always be generated with
Pmode, can't we add an assert if gen_rtx_LABEL_REF is called with a different
mode? Or better, remove the mode argument altogether
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
18:28 ---
Subject: Bug 20413
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: sh-elf-4_1-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-08 18:28:02
Modified files:
gcc: Cha
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
17:43 ---
Subject: Bug 20413
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: sh-elf-4_1-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-08 17:41:35
Modified files:
gcc/config/sh : crt
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
16:36 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I have removed the build keyword because I have found an ugly hack -
> wildcard splitters - that allow the sh64-elf build to proceed
> despite of this bug.
Note this workaround do
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
12:19 ---
I have removed the build keyword because I have found an ugly hack -
wildcard splitters - that allow the sh64-elf build to proceed
despite of this bug.
--
What|Removed |A
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||20695
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20413
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-12
17:27 ---
Confirmed, I commented about the mode just recently.
--
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10
19:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=8375)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8375&action=view)
patch against 3.4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20413
14 matches
Mail list logo
