--- Comment #12 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 22:17 ---
Three and a half year of nothing. Dead horse.
=> Closing. If something shows up, open a new bug report please.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-08-12
09:35 ---
Sure, but it's a good start. I read on http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/BerndSchmidt
that the reload-branch would need some testing/fixing on autoinc target. Maybe
Joern might be interested in giving a look at it.
--- Additional Comments From bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de 2005-08-12
09:07 ---
The reload-branch takes apart all this code, so there's a good chance it's
fixed. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try to get it right in the mainline...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-08-11
17:05 ---
Bernd, do you believe this is taken care of by the reload branch?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-08-11 16:13 ---
I don't think this is actually fixed in reload1.c. Perhaps it is hidden
by other changes, so that the particular miscompilation doesn't happen
anymore, but even HEAD reload1.c contains the questionable double countin
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-11
13:07 ---
4.1.0, 4.0.2 and 3.4.5 work with all -O0 -O1 -O2 -O3.
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux) and gcc 3.3.6 abort with -O1.
I guess this is RESOLVED FIXED as far as gcc bugzilla is concerned?
--
What|
