--- Comment #18 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 15:24 ---
Closing this as a dup of bug 38582 because that bug has a test case.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38582 ***
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #17 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-12-22 08:18 ---
reopening as of PR38582 (where rename registers takes 13 hours to do its job).
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #16 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-11-05 08:21 ---
No, but I don't think this should hold up marking this PR as fixed.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-03 07:57
---
Paolo, do you know what the status of this PR is? Ian said in comment #14 that
the pass should be rewritten to use the DF framework. Has this happened? TIA.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #14 from ian at airs dot com 2007-04-25 06:26 ---
-frename-registers should be rewritten to use the new DF framework when
dataflow branch is merged.
Lowering priority to P3. This is not high priority.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #13 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 16:20 ---
Haven't seen any reports of wrong-code coming out of register renaming in a
while. Register renaming is enabled if loop unrolling / peeling is enabled. So
the test coverage of this pass is much better than it used t
