--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 18:19
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Still an issue here??
I think the slowness still exist.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 22:29 ---
Still an issue here??
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 18:03
---
(In reply to comment #9)
>Don't know how widespread this would be; other rs6000 targets for sure.
Yes this shows up as PR 23392 with the GNU runtime and objc exceptions.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
--- Comment #9 from dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-24 17:58 ---
Another bug in renaming just showed up on darwin rs6000. When renaming changes
a register in the RTL, it does not make the corresponding change in attached
FRAME_RELATED notes. This leads to inaccurate Dwarf exceptio
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04
09:51 ---
The liveness analysis in df.c misses the registers marked in
flow.c:mark_regs_live_at_end, so that'd have to be fixed first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15023
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04
09:04 ---
I'd like to mention a known problem with -frename-registers. Quoting my
analysis for another bug report:
"However the underlying problem is still present and is now visible on x86-64:
the register renami
--
Bug 15023 depends on bug 22472, which changed state.
Bug 22472 Summary: [4.1 regression] testsuite failure
gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c -O3 -funroll-loops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22472
What|Old Value |New Value
--
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15023
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||22208
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15023
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-26
11:26 ---
The patch for PR18599 might have addressed the "slow" part of this bug
report. The "buggy" part may also be fixed already -- a number of e500
related regrename.c patches went in since this bug report was o
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-26
09:21 ---
Thanks Serge!
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-06-26 00:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> if anyone knows where to find those discussions mentioned in comments
> #0 and #1, can he/she please link them to this report?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-25
13:29 ---
This bug report is totally useless. There are no links to the relevant
discussions that have apparently taken place. There are no test cases,
no examples of what or where or why things go wrong. I believ
13 matches
Mail list logo
