--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06
09:55 ---
> So is this another problem with RTH's "complex" patches?
Yes, and fixing it the straightforward way leads to more failures with complex
integers.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1877
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
12:51 ---
Right, so we should perhaps add a check for ieeefp.h in the
configure machinery, and include it when it's there. Hmm...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18776
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
11:38 ---
> BTW Where is this coming from?
> /home/eric/cvs/gcc/libgfortran/libgfortran.h: In function 'isfinite':
> /home/eric/cvs/gcc/libgfortran/libgfortran.h:96: warning: implicit declaration
>
> My 'man finite
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
11:26 ---
So is this another problem with RTH's "complex" patches?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18776
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
11:24 ---
BTW Where is this coming from?
/home/eric/cvs/gcc/libgfortran/libgfortran.h: In function 'isfinite':
/home/eric/cvs/gcc/libgfortran/libgfortran.h:96: warning: implicit declaration
My 'man finite' says that f
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
11:11 ---
> Conisdering this not compiling Fortran at this point but C so I learning
towards > miscompiling of the middle-end.
Oops! You're right, this is C. And it turns out this is not a miscompilation,
but a pr
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-02
13:18 ---
Conisdering this not compiling Fortran at this point but C so I learning
towards miscompiling of the
middle-end.
--
What|Removed |Added
