[Bug regression/18643] [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS

2004-11-24 Thread corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 05:43 --- Patches applied to gcc-3_4-branch and CVS-trunk. -- What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug regression/18643] [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS

2004-11-24 Thread corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 04:41 --- (In reply to comment #3) >> So the actual question is: >>What has set LIMITS_H_TEST to "true" before, and why isn't it set true >> anymore? I believe to have found the cause (testing is still in progress).

[Bug regression/18643] [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS

2004-11-24 Thread joel at oarcorp dot com
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-24 15:50 --- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24 > 15:02 --- > (In reply to comment

[Bug regression/18643] [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS

2004-11-24 Thread corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24 15:02 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Nothing in fixincludes look wrong. The new fixincludes do not apply to limits.h at all. But the old one probably did. The limits.h gcc-3.4 < 2004-11-17 produced, contains fragme

[Bug regression/18643] [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS

2004-11-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24 04:27 --- Nothing in fixincludes look wrong. The new fixincludes do not apply to limits.h at all. These were the only changes on the 3.4 branch: 2004-11-21 Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * fixinc/inclha