https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069
--- Comment #8 from Yichao Yu ---
OK, done. It would be nice to mention it on
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
If you need to get the gfortran developers attention, you must submit your
patch to fort...@gcc.gnu.org.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069
--- Comment #6 from Yichao Yu ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/549411.html
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/549413.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Also note that I've already submitted patches to fix this though
> I haven't got a reply yet.
Where did you submit the patches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069
--- Comment #4 from Yichao Yu ---
> Apparently it is.
Yes, but my question is about why should this be "WONTFIX". This feature
(reproducible build) is certainly as useful in fortran as it is in C family.
> Let move the component to 'preprocesso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |preprocessor
--- Comment #3 from
