https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Ken Matsui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ken Matsui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:821d56100e1110ab6a166f50819522254eb30923
commit r15-4191-g821d56100e1110ab6a166f50819522254eb30923
Author: Ken Matsui
Date: Fri Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Ken Matsui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jadexradex at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Diego SC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||diego.santacruz at spinetix
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Alejandro Colomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Justin Bassett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbassett271 at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
martin at log2 dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin at log2 dot ch
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to sduguay from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> > In any case, I agree with confirming this as a bug: all warnings should be
> > controllable by a -Wxxx option.
> >
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
--- Comment #8 from sduguay ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> In any case, I agree with confirming this as a bug: all warnings should be
> controllable by a -Wxxx option.
>
> Adding such an option is quite easy, and a good firs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to sduguay from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Testcase:
> >
> > #pragma once
> > int main() {}
> >
> > > g++ t.C -S
> > t.C:1:9: warning: #pragma once in main fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
--- Comment #4 from sduguay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> You haven't explained why do you need to use #pragma once in the main cpp
> source file, are you sometimes including it as a header and other times
> compiling it as th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
--- Comment #3 from sduguay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Testcase:
>
> #pragma once
> int main() {}
>
> > g++ t.C -S
> t.C:1:9: warning: #pragma once in main file
> #pragma once
> ^~~~
>
>
> you could work aro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
19 matches
Mail list logo