https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #29 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Feb 23 17:44:28 2016
New Revision: 233638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/69126: avoid comparing ad-hoc and non-ad-hoc locations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #28 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Feb 23 17:39:16 2016
New Revision: 233637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add test coverage for _Pragma (PR preprocessor 69126, 69543, 69558)
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #26 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #25)
[...]
> I have a patch that seems to work for this test case; am testing it more
> thoroughly now.
Candidate patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #25 from David Malc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #24 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #23)
> That is weird. If you use "GCC diagnostic warning" instead of "ignored", you
> should be able to see some changes in locations between -O0 and -O1 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #23 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #18)
> (Also, the problem
> only happens with -O or higher.)
That is weird. If you use "GCC diagnostic warning" instead of "ignored", you
should be able to s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #22 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20)
> Does the http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02347.html workaround
> help here in any way?
No, unfortunately not. Doesn't change the behaviour in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In any case, we need much better testsuite coverage for the cases that the
various projects use (glib2, LO, ...), so that we don't regress on those
without knowing about it months later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Does the http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02347.html workaround
help here in any way?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #16 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Jan 27 18:57:51 2016
New Revision: 232893
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232893&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libcpp: use better locations for _Pragma tokens (preprocessor/69126)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
> the regression and I'm pretty sure would not introduce other wrt the status
> pre-r226234, but I don't fully understand why that is necessary, there are
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Related bug 52116
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01212.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
20 matches
Mail list logo
