--- Comment #5 from mbland at google dot com 2007-01-08 19:58 ---
Subject: Re: Warning for absolute or dotted header paths
On 8 Jan 2007 19:53:06 -, tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-08 19:5
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-08 19:53 ---
What's the status of this?
The Google assignment situation has been resolved, so I think
the patch submission can move forward...
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from mbland at google dot com 2006-03-30 21:09 ---
Right, I've got a mainline patch now, too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26857
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 20:12 ---
Confirmed, just a note, all patches need to go on the mainline before even
thinking about being backported. (Yes I know how long the copyright issues are
because I am trying to get my fixed up too).
--
pinskia a
--- Comment #1 from mbland at google dot com 2006-03-27 19:25 ---
I've got a working patch for 4.1.0, including a test case, reviewed by Ian
Lance Taylor. As soon as "our people" can work out an agreement with "your
people" over copyright assignment, I'll be sure to post it to this PR.
