[Bug preprocessor/14438] Potential need for buffer overflow checks in _cpp_lex_direct

2006-12-28 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #25 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 07:58 --- FWIW I've been looking at this area for PR 29966. I don't see how overflow checking could be added to _cpp_lex_direct. However I did end up adding an assertion to _cpp_lex_token, to try to expose a hidden assumption

[Bug preprocessor/14438] Potential need for buffer overflow checks in _cpp_lex_direct

2005-09-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.2 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14438

[Bug preprocessor/14438] Potential need for buffer overflow checks in _cpp_lex_direct

2005-07-07 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14438

[Bug preprocessor/14438] Potential need for buffer overflow checks in _cpp_lex_direct

2005-07-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 02:14 --- Unassigning from Zack since he is now gone from GCC development. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug preprocessor/14438] Potential need for buffer overflow checks in _cpp_lex_direct

2005-04-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.0 |4.0.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14438