https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
--- Comment #13 from David Stone ---
I understand the difference between the two. I just prefer an opt-out system of
warnings instead of opt-in. If absolutely no one could possibly want a warning,
it shouldn't exist. If some users would want the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Stone from comment #11)
> If the warnings are so ridiculous that no one could possibly want them on,
> then maybe we should remove them.
No because there's a difference between somethin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
--- Comment #11 from David Stone ---
If the warnings are so ridiculous that no one could possibly want them on, then
maybe we should remove them. Otherwise, I would want -Weverything and I can use
-Wno-warnings-I-do-not-want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse ---
Manuel, you seem to want a -Wsuper-extra that you can use everyday (maybe with
a couple -Wno-*). What some other people want with -Weverything is a way to
discover what warnings are available in the compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to David Stone from comment #8)
> I have changed my opinion on this and agree that warning levels are probably
> not the way to go. The two things from this that I do still want are
>
> -Weve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
--- Comment #8 from David Stone ---
I have changed my opinion on this and agree that warning levels are probably
not the way to go. The two things from this that I do still want are
-Weverything-and-I-really-mean-it-this-time
All warnings eithe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #7 from Manue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-08 17:59:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 28901
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28901
-Weverything
A very basic implementation of -Weverything (I don't really understand that
cod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
--- Comment #1 from David Stone 2012-05-10
22:00:17 UTC ---
We could also consider deprecating -Wall and -Wextra in favor of the numbered
warnings, but that obviously is not required.
14 matches
Mail list logo
