http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
bluetooth.developer at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluetooth.developer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #16 from Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-03-16
14:41:50 UTC ---
More users trying to get this feature by parsing the output of GCC (which is
not meant to be machine-readable): http://www.mixtion.org/gccfilter/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-02
19:51:34 UTC ---
For future reference, more examples of color diagnostics in clang can be found
here:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2009-10/StateOfClang.pdf
but that is quite old, recent clang versio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-10-02
17:52:39 UTC ---
Somehow I missed this bug when searching. For those here in favour of color,
clang has it and people love it [*]. Luckily, this is one of those clang things
that can be done in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 f
--- Comment #11 from pva at gentoo dot org 2008-05-07 06:54 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> The other issue here is that people want different colors for each of their
> warnings so why hardcode it.
It should be easy to make this configurable...
Well I've googled a bit and did not found
--- Comment #10 from brian at dessent dot net 2008-05-06 22:06 ---
Subject: Re: colorize output of gcc
esigra at gmail dot com wrote:
> printf("%s%s%s%s", warning_format_start, _("warning: "), _("the actual
> message"), warning_format_end);
But then that is not simply "adding a colou
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 21:58 ---
The other issue here is that people want different colors for each of their
warnings so why hardcode it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
--- Comment #8 from esigra at gmail dot com 2008-05-06 21:55 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If you added escape sequences to the string constants in the gcc source
> then it would only work for the C locale messages.
Adding escape sequences for colours would work as well with localizati
--- Comment #7 from brian at dessent dot net 2008-05-06 21:28 ---
Subject: Re: colorize output of gcc
esigra at gmail dot com wrote:
> And seriously, what is more efficcent, adding a
> colour code sequence to the string constans in GCC that says "warning:",
> "error:" etc or having a
--- Comment #6 from esigra at gmail dot com 2008-05-06 18:40 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I rather not add too much complexity to gcc diagnostic output. Which means
> no color.
We did not demand that you do it personally. We just think that it would be a
really good idea if someone
--- Comment #5 from pva at gentoo dot org 2008-05-06 18:07 ---
Andrew, it's very pity to see this bug closed as invalid so fast. Besides being
useful, people enjoy colors and people work with compilers...
I've already stated that, but I repeat. colorgcc does not work in case you have
lo
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 17:37 ---
I rather not add too much complexity to gcc diagnostic output. Which means no
color. colorgcc could be extended to get the correct coloring for the
locazation.
See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 17:35 ---
http://schlueters.de/colorgcc.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
--- Comment #2 from esigra at gmail dot com 2008-05-06 17:27 ---
I would definitely like GCC to produce colourized output. It can really improve
the readability. I miss that feature. It has my vote.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 15:28 ---
I don't think we should do this. There is already a secondary program that
does the coloring too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
17 matches
Mail list logo
