--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 04:56 ---
So this is not a GCC bug so closing as such.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-11-28 04:19
---
I would guess this isn't a gcc problem, but rather that the elfutils testsuite
hasn't been updated for new binutils. Older binutils put _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
at the start of .got but the powerpc SYSV ABI allows _
--- Comment #6 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-26 12:17 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> waiting for a short testcase and/or see if it has been fixed already.
4.1 (rev. 107414) doesn't fix this problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25004
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 20:19 ---
waiting for a short testcase and/or see if it has been fixed already.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 18:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> build/genrecog ../../gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md > tmp-recog.c
> ../../gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md:13543: warning: operand 0 missing mode?
> ../../gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1706: warning
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-23 18:31 ---
i'm currently bootstraping rev107414...
btw. i'm observing several warnings for some time...
(...)
build/genrecog ../../gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md > tmp-recog.c
../../gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md:13543: warning: operand 0 mi
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 16:27 ---
Can you first try after revision 107117 because I think that might had fixed
the problem by looking at the numbers which don't match?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25004
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-23 16:16 ---
> PASS: run-elflint-test.sh
^^^ should be a FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh
> section [37] '.symtab': _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ symbol value 0x10011998
>does not match .got section address 0x10011990
--
h
