--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 09:16
---
*** Bug 25200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 09:15
---
*** Bug 25602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-15 16:40
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-15 16:39
---
*** Bug 24039 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-30
09:38 ---
Could you post the exact configure line and command line you used to build the
compiler? And the output of 'gcc -v' for the bootstrap compiler?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From fgccbz0 at greynode dot net 2005-08-29 13:36
---
> It sounds like you have a mismatching header installed and nothing more.
Such a difference is certainly possible - thank's for the e-mail address. That
ought to provide the hook I need to continue.
--
h
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26
17:20 ---
Eric Botcazou is sparc maintainer:
sparc port Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sounds like you have a mismatching header installed and nothing more.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Additional Comments From fgccbz0 at greynode dot net 2005-08-25 21:46
---
I'm not really sure how to proceed here. I've told you a symptom, a diagnosis
describing a probable flaw in the code, and possible solution. You've pointed me
at some logs from a person I don't know with an inv
--- Additional Comments From fgccbz0 at greynode dot net 2005-08-25 14:09
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 4.1.0 works just fine:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00241.html
> So does 4.0.2:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00182.html
Thanks.
> So it
--- Additional Comments From fgccbz0 at greynode dot net 2005-08-25 13:30
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This sounds like a bug in your configuration as nobody else I know of has had
this problem.
Are you sure these unnamed other people are using not just 64-bit targeted but
64-bit host
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-25
13:35 ---
4.1.0 works just fine:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00241.html
So does 4.0.2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00182.html
So it has to be your configuration is different
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-24
11:37 ---
This sounds like a bug in your configuration as nobody else I know of has had
this problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
