--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-17 08:57
---
Assuming that the intertwined compiler issues get fixed, the libstdc++ patch
should be trivial, I'm attaching to 19664 an old draft that maybe has now some
hunks wrong about copyright dates (if you can rework tho
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-05-17 08:27 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Known gcc bug. Check out my patch in bug 19664:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00180.html
>
> You may need to fix libstdc++ header files also.
in PR19664 i see di
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-04 17:15 ---
Known gcc bug. Check out my patch in bug 19664:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00180.html
You may need to fix libstdc++ header files also.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19664 ***
--
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmazur at kernel dot pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21382
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-04 15:08
---
Created an attachment (id=8819)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8819&action=view)
build log.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21382
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-04 15:08
---
Created an attachment (id=8818)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8818&action=view)
build log.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21382
