[Bug other/116080] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-07-24 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #4 from Haochen Jiang --- Hmm, it is interesting that I even could not reproduce that on the same machine.

[Bug other/116080] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-07-24 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 Haochen Jiang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com --- Comm

[Bug other/116080] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-07-24 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen --- Also can you upload the whole log files somewhere? I would like to see what the output of check_effective_target_struct_tail_call is. It should have caught some of these problems.

[Bug other/116080] New tests from r15-2233-g8d1af8f904a0c0 fail

2024-07-24 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080 --- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen --- Yes it is known that powerpc (or some flavors of it) has poor tail call support due to ABI limitations. Just need to figure out how to skip the test. I guess it needs a better test in check_effective_target_ta