--- Comment #8 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-11 09:11 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > -(hopefully) Andrew's analysis is correct (but, I guess I'd like to know
> > why it
> > fixed them ... )..
>
> IIRC the issue with section anchors and the objec
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 20:28 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> -(hopefully) Andrew's analysis is correct (but, I guess I'd like to know why
> it
> fixed them ... )..
IIRC the issue with section anchors and the objective-c front-end was the decl
was b
--- Comment #6 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 19:15 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I do not see the fails shown in:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg00563.html
> with my current tree [162035] - but I'm using simulator combined tree build -
> with glibc fro
--- Comment #5 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 19:40 ---
I do not see the fails shown in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg00563.html
with my current tree [162035] - but I'm using simulator combined tree build -
with glibc from a Debian distribution (I forget
--- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-10 18:49 ---
The issue is still very much there with 4.[456] on arm-linux-gnueabi, see e.g.
the test results I post. In my 4.4 production compiler I apply Ramana's fix,
and it eliminates all objc test failures for me. Haven't checke
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 18:20 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> is this still current?
> I can't reproduce any compile problems on arm-unknown-eabi or
> armel-unknown-gnueabi (as cross-tools hosted under i686-apple-darwin).
You might have fixed them wh
--- Comment #2 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 16:43 ---
is this still current?
I can't reproduce any compile problems on arm-unknown-eabi or
armel-unknown-gnueabi (as cross-tools hosted under i686-apple-darwin).
--
iains at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-30 13:15 ---
Patch submitted here. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01792.html
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
