https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
There's no code code to handle the last case. The first case is handled
because the local s is assigned to a temporary and there is code to detect
uninitialized sources of assignments. The second case is han
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Martin, it is not clear from the dumps what is the difference between the two
cases. Also, this warning triggers even with -O0, so it must come pretty
earlier even before we have VOPS. What is the diffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org