https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92936
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2dcb174385fd366282bf34bf95adbf918d5befda
commit r15-4792-g2dcb174385fd366282bf34bf95adbf918d5befda
Author: Sam James
Date: Thu Oct 31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92936
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92936
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eafe8ee7af13c39805ea09bbf5b4f9ab2a48304a
commit r11-5523-geafe8ee7af13c39805ea09bbf5b4f9ab2a48304a
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92936
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92936
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
In full generality it would require inspecting all possible program paths
(and then decide which ones are "impossible" to take). We're not doing that.
Still we should have n = [3, 5] and yes, no info for p