https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86554
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
The issue seems to be that we do
Value numbering ret_10 stmt = ret_10 = (int) _9;
Setting value number of ret_10 to ret_11 (changed)
so we correctly figure both ret are the same. We then continue
Value n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86554
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86554
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
