[Bug middle-end/85682] Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85682 Luis Machado changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85682] Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85682 --- Comment #4 from Luis Machado --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #3) > The bisect robot doesn't bootstrap, only build a stage 1 compiler. > > I've checked your most recent patch against these testcases, and they > execute and comp

[Bug middle-end/85682] Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85682 --- Comment #3 from James Greenhalgh --- The bisect robot doesn't bootstrap, only build a stage 1 compiler. I've checked your most recent patch against these testcases, and they execute and complete fine. (In reply to Luis Machado from comment

[Bug middle-end/85682] Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85682 --- Comment #2 from Luis Machado --- Did it even bootstrap properly? It shouldn't have been built in the first place i guess, due to the signedness error of a particular chunk of code. I did a fresh x86-64 bootstrap with the changes in and those

[Bug middle-end/85682] Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85682 --- Comment #1 from Luis Machado --- Will do. I've temporarily reverted the prefetcher changes since it caused x86 bootstrap issues. I'll investigate this alongside it.