https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85633
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85633
--- Comment #4 from Julian Taylor ---
Oh that is unfortunate.
I guess one has to inject the dependency in the fpu checking function as an
argument then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85633
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
See PR 38960 for why I said this is not a regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85633
--- Comment #2 from Julian Taylor ---
changing the fpu state does not count as a side effect?
This doesn't seem plausible, this type of code is one the reasons the fpu
exception state exists.
There is a lot of code written with this in mind which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85633
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Summary|[8 Regress
