https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > > --- Comment #5 from Krister Walfridsson --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from Krister Walfridsson ---
> Did you mean PR61502 - "== comparison on "one-past" pointer gives wrong
> result"?
Yes, bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
Krister Walfridsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
--- Comment #3 from Nuno Lopes ---
Sorry, I forgot to include the code for b.c:
void f(int*x, int*y) {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
--- Comment #2 from Nuno Lopes ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I don't see how this can ever be defined code.
>
> By definition yi will never be equal to pi unless by accident.
Sure, that's ok, but then pi = &x, and so the sto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see how this can ever be defined code.
By definition yi will never be equal to pi unless by accident.
