[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 3 07:25:50 2014 New Revision: 208267 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208267&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/60175 * function.c (expand_function_end): Don't emit

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/function.c.jj2014-01-06 22:32:17.0 +0100 +++ gcc/function.c2014-02-14 19:05:27.233008179 +0100 @@ -5156,17 +5156,20 @@ expand_function_end (void) crtl->return_rtx = outgoing;

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- The incorrect frequencies can be seen even on say -O1 -fsanitize=address -fdump-rtl-expand-all: static void *stack_base; void mark_memory (void **start, void **end); int main (void) { void *dummy; stack_

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even on x86_64 one can see the bogus frequencies like 2 when or 1999N when maximum is 1, but only in the epilogue blocks.

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 --- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov --- Thanks, I'll run regtests on Monday and send patch for gcc-patches approve if all goes well.

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 --- Comment #4 from Teresa Johnson --- On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:01 AM, y.gribov at samsung dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 > > Yury Gribov changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 --- Comment #2 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 32132 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32132&action=edit Proposed patch So it looks like we are using wrong function here. Frequency does not need to have the same bounds a

[Bug middle-end/60175] ICE on gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Comment #1