http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try:
// GCC Bug - bug.c
// Created by Arsham Skrenes on 2013-12-17
#include
#include
// Find the NTH prime number SAMPLES times
#define NTH 1
#define SAMPLES 5
int main(void)
{
struct timeva
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #6 from Arsham Skrenes ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5)
> > Also, is there a directive that I can use to explicitly tell GCC
> > to not remove a loop (without having to resort to a compiler flag
> > which is glo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Also, is there a directive that I can use to explicitly tell GCC
> to not remove a loop (without having to resort to a compiler flag
> which is global, printing a variable, or using the 'volatile' k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
Arsham Skrenes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #4 from Arsham Skrenes ---
Can I suggest then that GCC outputs a compiler warning when it removes a loop?
It outputs warnings for unused variables as well as implicit casting, so why
not have a warning for removing loops?
Also, is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
