subject:"\[Bug middle\-end\/56729\] \[4.9 Regression\] ICE in df_insn

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

2013-10-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

2013-04-16 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2013-04-16 19:48:53 UTC --- r197942 should have fixed this properly. I'm testing powerpc64 unix/-m32 to confirm.

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

2013-03-27 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-27 23:45:30 UTC --- Bah. Index: df-scan.c === --- df-scan.c (revision 197180) +++ df-scan.c (working copy) @@ -1158,8 +115

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

2013-03-26 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

2013-03-26 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn 2013-03-26 18:29:16 UTC --- The failure only occurs in 32 bit mode and would not have been seen by a default bootstrap on powerpc64-linux that did not run the testsuite in 32 bit mode. $ ./xgcc -B./ -O1 -m32 /