https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jay from comment #7)
>
>
> Perhaps I'll try with trunk.
>
>
> - Jay
Have you tried with trunk yet?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #7 from Jay 2013-02-20 08:51:49 UTC
---
Here is the "successful experiment", where I changed the code to operate on all
the div variants. Of course I am NOT suggesting this change be made. Nor is it
100% conclusive. But it is very mu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #6 from Jay 2013-02-19 21:52:31 UTC
---
> should pass op0 and op1 to the fold_build2_loc call, instead of arg0/arg1
I don't disagree, but I really I don't know.
Clearly that means almost but not exactly the same thing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
16:23:03 UTC ---
At least from what is described in that PR, it would look like it is just fine
to use EXACT_DIV_EXPR, but that we should pass op0 and op1 to the
fold_build2_loc call, instead of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #4 from Jay 2013-02-19 16:18:02 UTC
---
ah, here is more info; I reported the bug better years ago but it was never
looked at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46679
There I don't claim bad code, but a failu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #3 from Jay 2013-02-18 20:50:44 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> call? Anyway, it would be better to see a testcase.
I'm not sure I can construct one in C.
It might be too painful for you to take what I have -- a genera
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|U
