http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Georg from comment #11)
> For clarity, just asking: Does this mean that
>
> 1. if I compile a program on HOST with bit size N,
> for a TARGET with bit size M, then gcc will sorry()
> just in ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
--- Comment #11 from Georg ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #10)
> Fixed.
For clarity, just asking: Does this mean that
1. if I compile a program on HOST with bit size N,
for a TARGET with bit size M, then gcc will sorry()
just in ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Dec 3 12:11:36 2013
New Revision: 205628
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/56344
* calls.c (expand_call): Disallow passing hug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.8.2
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1
--- Comment #6 from Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-22
14:33:37 UTC ---
Or probably s/break/continue/, in that case we'd issue error () on every
ill-sized parameter. And of course, it's completely untested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|U
10 matches
Mail list logo