http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55001
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-28
00:13:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Can this be considered fixed?
> Not completely. It doesn't fail anymore (so I marked PR55167 as fixed),
> Now if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55001
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-11-27 23:52:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can this be considered fixed?
Not completely. It doesn't fail anymore (so I marked PR55167 as fixed), but for
architectures that support vectors of 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55001
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55001
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Handle VEC_COND_EXPR in |Handle VEC_COND_EXPR better
