http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54394
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54394
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2012-08-31
13:13:09 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Aug 31 13:13:03 2012
New Revision: 190831
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190831
Log:
2012-08-31 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54394
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2012-08-30
15:32:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > You can try whether it fixes your regression too.
>
> Yes, it does. Thanks.
Great, thanks.
>
> Did you check if you get the same run time with -flto an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54394
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-08-29
21:30:45 UTC ---
> You can try whether it fixes your regression too.
Yes, it does. Thanks.
Did you check if you get the same run time with -flto and -fwhole-program? If
yes, it would probably
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54394
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54394
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|fatigue2 -flto run time |[4.8 Regression] fatigue2
