http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Please open a new bugreport - this seems completely unrelated.
Done - # 58911
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-20
10:26:52 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 20 10:26:45 2012
New Revision: 190528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190528
Log:
2012-08-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-20
08:53:13 UTC ---
The issue is that we now merge two blocks we didn't merge before which
introduces SSA names into a STMT that are marked for update (thus, in
old_ssa_names):
:
# a_12 = PHI <0B(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|c
