http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-05-14
09:39:20 UTC ---
> That patch was supposed to be a no-op on code generation.
I have opened pr53340.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-14
09:32:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > 20% runtime regression in rnflow [1] happened in this timeframe, perhaps it
> > could be attributed to the patch, mentioned in Comment #2.
>
> This slo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-05-14
09:21:41 UTC ---
> 20% runtime regression in rnflow [1] happened in this timeframe, perhaps it
> could be attributed to the patch, mentioned in Comment #2.
This slowdown is caused by revision 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-14 09:03:20
UTC ---
20% runtime regression in rnflow [1] happened in this timeframe, perhaps it
could be attributed to the patch, mentioned in Comment #2.
[1] http://gcc.opensuse.org/c++bench/polyhedron/po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-13 19:26:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Following testcase:
>
> --cut here--
> #define SIZE 10240
>
> int b[SIZE], c[SIZE];
> long long __attribute__((__aligned__ (128))) a[SIZE];
This line should
