http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-25
11:31:47 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Apr 25 11:31:42 2012
New Revision: 186815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186815
Log:
PR middle-end/53088
* gcc.target/i386/pr390
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-25
11:21:52 UTC ---
Hmm, after some playing with this, I don't really know how to make the warning
output right all the time. To fix the regression I will simply update the
testcase.
The warning now goes o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-24
15:12:36 UTC ---
I guess get_curr_insn_source_location is what I neeed...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-24
15:07:21 UTC ---
At few places in cgraph code we set location to get those late diagnostics
right. It sort of makes sense for function wide diagnostics, but it is not this
one.
(gdb) bt
#0 inform (loca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-23
18:54:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Mine. i386 outputs the message with input_loc, so it seems we need to set it
> correctly.
It should use some more sensible location though - input_locat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
