http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-02
13:29:34 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Feb 2 13:29:31 2012
New Revision: 183836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183836
Log:
PR middle-end/51998
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-31
14:50:56 UTC ---
I guess in varpool.c you shouldn't talk about function in the message.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-31
13:56:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26534
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26534
Patch in testing
Hi,
I am testing the attached patch. It also plugs symmetric problem on varpool.
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-26 14:23:21 UTC
---
> I think remove_attribute would be desirable too. But I wonder if it can't be
> detected earlier than here. In any case, I'd like to hear Honza on this.
I was under impression that v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-25
16:38:05 UTC ---
I think remove_attribute would be desirable too. But I wonder if it can't be
detected earlier than here. In any case, I'd like to hear Honza on this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-25 16:33:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think fatal_error is undesirable, you should error on it somewhere and just
> drop the alias attribute.
Jakub,
like this? :
...
Index: cgraph.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
