http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442
--- Comment #4 from Brendan Conoboy 2011-12-10
01:49:25 UTC ---
FYI, I've checked out svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_6-branch
revision 182172, run and rerun the complete testsuite before and after this
patch (As well as the patch Richar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-12-07
10:55:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 26010 [details]
> Only use BLKmode for volatile accesses which are not naturally aligned.
>
> Per Julian Brown's original email at
> h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442
--- Comment #2 from Brendan Conoboy 2011-12-06
21:12:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 26010
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26010
Only use BLKmode for volatile accesses which are not naturally aligned.
Per Julian Brown's origina
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442
--- Comment #1 from Brendan Conoboy 2011-12-06
21:02:22 UTC ---
This bug is in reference to the patch that Diego Novillo accepted into 4.7
about 10 months ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01477.html
The issue is still present i
