http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 11:18:14 UTC ---
Author: vries
Revision: 179655
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 13 11:18:09 2011
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-13 11:10:06 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Oct 13 11:10:01 2011
New Revision: 179916
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179916
Log:
Fix PR middle-end/50527 ChangeLog entry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 12:50:00 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:49:56 2011
New Revision: 179656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179656
Log:
2011-10-07 Tom de Vries
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 12:49:54 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:49:49 2011
New Revision: 179655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179655
Log:
2011-10-07 Tom de Vries
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-09-27 11:08:01 UTC ---
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
>
> --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 10:49:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 10:49:23 UTC ---
> I think we can check if the size is constant in evaluate_stmt and
> compute alignment according to that.
We can only do that in the last ccp phase that does folding of vl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-09-27 09:28:42 UTC ---
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
>
> --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 09:21:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 09:23:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 25368
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25368
proposed patch
> Hm, I suppose we should then make all replacement decls have
> BIGGEST_AL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-27 09:21:12 UTC ---
> Or alternatively (given we re-compute alignment together with folding alloca),
> assign the same alignment as folding would.
At the point that we determine the alloca align
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenther at suse dot de|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-26
15:00:49 UTC ---
Hm, I suppose we should then make all replacement decls have BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT
rather than min (BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT, object-size). Or alternatively
(given we re-compute alignment tog
13 matches
Mail list logo
